Saturday, 28 May 2016
Build Review - Antares C3M4 Combat Drone
Warlord Games' C3M4 Combat Drone for Beyond The Gates of Antares is now on general sale for twenty five of our English Pounds sterling.
Inside the box are two plastic sprues of components and and three stands for the combat drone and two slave drones. The primary stand comes with two different lengths for posing multiple buys.
The build instructions are clear and helpful.
The drone goes together really easily. Everything fits perfectly, to my relief. I have been constructing some classic aircraft kits recently and some of them end up more filler than plastic. I suppose it took me about half an hour and some of that was waiting for glue to dry.
The components are robust and chunky - very suitable for wargaming.
All the turrets (and other bits) rotate and the kit boasts a clever design idea. A choice of three main weapons are included: a plasma cannon, a compression cannon, and a fractal cannon. The twist is that they clip on and off without gluing or fitting rare earth magnets.
Brilliant!
The finished kit is about the size of a 1/72 WWII fighter plane so, again, well designed for wargaming.
I think even SF wargamers who don't play Antares will fancy picking up one of these. Plastic kits are so much more convenient for storage and carrying around than resin because they are robust and light.
Recommended.
Now to paint it.
Friday, 20 May 2016
Air Support For My Bolt Action Japanese Forces
Three Japanese Army fighter aircraft. Imperial Japan had no independent air force and the Army and Navy treated each other as enemy powers. The IJN procured land-based planes that were completely different from IJA planes, right down to the minor fittings.
I use 1/72 models for Bolt Action air support because of their convenient size.
From right to left, we have:
Type 1 'Oscar'
The most common Army fighter, nearly 6,000 were built, it soldiered on to the end of the war despite increasing obsolescence: light, manoeuvrable, fragile and under-armed.
Type 2 'Tojo'
A heavier armed interceptor, the Tojo was faster and less manoeuvrable than the Oscar. Poor performance at high altitude impeded its use against B29s. Over a thousand built.
Type 3 'Tony'
The most 'European' of the main three IJA fighters, the Tony had an inline engine. Over 3,000 built.
Navy Bomber 'Frances'
A fast, long-ranged, land-based, multi-role bomber, the Frances was too sophisticated for Japanese industry to manufacture in bulk and the thousand or so built were notorious for unreliability. A good medium bomber, the Frances was an utter failure as a nigh-fighter.
I use 1/72 models for Bolt Action air support because of their convenient size.
From right to left, we have:
Type 1 'Oscar'
The most common Army fighter, nearly 6,000 were built, it soldiered on to the end of the war despite increasing obsolescence: light, manoeuvrable, fragile and under-armed.
Type 2 'Tojo'
A heavier armed interceptor, the Tojo was faster and less manoeuvrable than the Oscar. Poor performance at high altitude impeded its use against B29s. Over a thousand built.
Type 3 'Tony'
The most 'European' of the main three IJA fighters, the Tony had an inline engine. Over 3,000 built.
Navy Bomber 'Frances'
A fast, long-ranged, land-based, multi-role bomber, the Frances was too sophisticated for Japanese industry to manufacture in bulk and the thousand or so built were notorious for unreliability. A good medium bomber, the Frances was an utter failure as a nigh-fighter.
Monday, 9 May 2016
Romney, Hythe & Dymchurch Light Railway Armoured Train
My daughters used to like a ride on the Romney,
Hythe & Dymchurch Light Railway when they were younger.
While working on my latest wargame project I came across this: Romney, Hythe & Dymchurch Light Railway Armoured Train.
And before anyone laughs, they are credited with an He111, Me109 and Do17 during the Battle of Britain....and there's not many light railways with that record.
While working on my latest wargame project I came across this: Romney, Hythe & Dymchurch Light Railway Armoured Train.
And before anyone laughs, they are credited with an He111, Me109 and Do17 during the Battle of Britain....and there's not many light railways with that record.
Saturday, 7 May 2016
Early Author Copy
Guess what just dropped through my door courtesy of those wonderful people at Osprey Wargames.
Available from all good bookshops, wargame shops and Amazon.
Available from all good bookshops, wargame shops and Amazon.
Tuesday, 3 May 2016
The First Jets - Huckebein
Red 4 & Yellow 4, two Focke-Wulf TA183 Huckebein in dangerously close formation at high altitude
After the failure of the Flitzer Project, Focke Wulf turned back to the 183. This was a true swept wing design. Swept wings reduce drag and the formation of shock waves as a plane approaches the speed of sound, i.e. transonic speeds.
The 183 had the usual problem of the poor quality early jet engines being unable to cope with long air intakes, hence the short body. So the tail had to be thrown back leading to doubts about flutter. The 183 prototype was still under construction when British troops captured the factory in April, 1945.
German designers knew more about swept wing designs than anybody else but a true understanding of the maths didn't come until later. Swept wings are fast but they introduce a whole new set of problems. Firstly landing speeds go up and the 183 would have had a narrow track landing configuration as there was no room in the thin wings for the wheels. Couple this to makeshift airfields and you have potential issues.
IAe 33 Pulqui II
The 183 would have had a 600mph top speed and a 47K' ceiling but would it have worked? The omens are not good.
After the war, Tank moved to Argentina and designed the IAe 33 Pulqui II as a successor to the pedestrian but functional Meteor. The plane is a reworked 183, with a British engine allowing a longer body.
And it was a dog with awful stability and wing-tip stall issues.
As a swept wing plane approaches stall speed, it loses lift from the wing tips, changing the centre of gravity and pushing the nose up, increasing the stall in a vicious positive feedback.
Korean war jets.
The landing behaviour of the Sabre gave rise to an all new problem for pilots - the Sabre Dance. Apparently watching novices porpoise towards the runway on landing approach became quite a spectator sport.
The British-engined MIG 15, probably the best of the early swept wing fighters, used a wonderfully Slavic crude but effective way to control the Sabre Dance: runners on the wings that stopped the air sliding down and off the wing tip.
Hawker Hunter
The next generation of western transonic fighters had 'notches' in the wing leading edge which had much the same effect as the MIG's runners.
As far as I know, neither of these fixes were known to German jet designers in the 1940s.
Grumman X29 research aircraft
The Germans did experiment with forward-swept wings which avoid the wingtip stall issue all together by stalling first at the wing roots. So why has no one ever built a forward-swept wing fighter?
Well, in a sharp climb the wings warp and the nose lifts, tending to push the plane into a stall.
At least one American transonic fighter made the wing tips wider than the wing root, which also helped to prevent wing tip stall.
And so it goes.
English Electric Lightning going supersonic: look where the shock waves form, wing tips and the cockpit area.
Designers did eventually get it right. The Lightning was the ultimate supersonic swept wing but it wasn't really a fighter. It was a point-defence interceptor where speed and rate of climb trumped all other factors. It had the same function as the Me 163 rocket plane.
Along with the Bloodhound rocket/jet powered missile the Lightning was the last ditch defence of the dispersed British V Bomber airfields. It's job was to keep away Soviet nuclear bombers just long enough for the V Bombers to get airborne and clear.
The Lightning had to use braking parachutes to land and we lost one a month to crashes in the 60s but it climbed at a near vertical inclination straight off the runway. And by God it was fast.
So would the FW 183 been part of the Wonderwaffe? Only if they had ten more years to get it right.
After the failure of the Flitzer Project, Focke Wulf turned back to the 183. This was a true swept wing design. Swept wings reduce drag and the formation of shock waves as a plane approaches the speed of sound, i.e. transonic speeds.
The 183 had the usual problem of the poor quality early jet engines being unable to cope with long air intakes, hence the short body. So the tail had to be thrown back leading to doubts about flutter. The 183 prototype was still under construction when British troops captured the factory in April, 1945.
German designers knew more about swept wing designs than anybody else but a true understanding of the maths didn't come until later. Swept wings are fast but they introduce a whole new set of problems. Firstly landing speeds go up and the 183 would have had a narrow track landing configuration as there was no room in the thin wings for the wheels. Couple this to makeshift airfields and you have potential issues.
IAe 33 Pulqui II
The 183 would have had a 600mph top speed and a 47K' ceiling but would it have worked? The omens are not good.
After the war, Tank moved to Argentina and designed the IAe 33 Pulqui II as a successor to the pedestrian but functional Meteor. The plane is a reworked 183, with a British engine allowing a longer body.
And it was a dog with awful stability and wing-tip stall issues.
As a swept wing plane approaches stall speed, it loses lift from the wing tips, changing the centre of gravity and pushing the nose up, increasing the stall in a vicious positive feedback.
Korean war jets.
The landing behaviour of the Sabre gave rise to an all new problem for pilots - the Sabre Dance. Apparently watching novices porpoise towards the runway on landing approach became quite a spectator sport.
The British-engined MIG 15, probably the best of the early swept wing fighters, used a wonderfully Slavic crude but effective way to control the Sabre Dance: runners on the wings that stopped the air sliding down and off the wing tip.
Hawker Hunter
The next generation of western transonic fighters had 'notches' in the wing leading edge which had much the same effect as the MIG's runners.
As far as I know, neither of these fixes were known to German jet designers in the 1940s.
Grumman X29 research aircraft
The Germans did experiment with forward-swept wings which avoid the wingtip stall issue all together by stalling first at the wing roots. So why has no one ever built a forward-swept wing fighter?
Well, in a sharp climb the wings warp and the nose lifts, tending to push the plane into a stall.
At least one American transonic fighter made the wing tips wider than the wing root, which also helped to prevent wing tip stall.
And so it goes.
English Electric Lightning going supersonic: look where the shock waves form, wing tips and the cockpit area.
Designers did eventually get it right. The Lightning was the ultimate supersonic swept wing but it wasn't really a fighter. It was a point-defence interceptor where speed and rate of climb trumped all other factors. It had the same function as the Me 163 rocket plane.
Along with the Bloodhound rocket/jet powered missile the Lightning was the last ditch defence of the dispersed British V Bomber airfields. It's job was to keep away Soviet nuclear bombers just long enough for the V Bombers to get airborne and clear.
The Lightning had to use braking parachutes to land and we lost one a month to crashes in the 60s but it climbed at a near vertical inclination straight off the runway. And by God it was fast.
So would the FW 183 been part of the Wonderwaffe? Only if they had ten more years to get it right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)